The box is open and the cat is dead. The mathematical theoretical physics behind the "no risk" financial market experiment has ended up killing it. Theoretically the possibility of a loss was insured out of existence.
For example;
- Bank A issued a financial instrument and took out a CDS with Bank B against a possible default or loss.
- Bank B took out another CDS with Bank C to cover the possibility of Bank A's financial instrument going bad.
- Bank A took out another CDS against Bank C if it had to pay Bank B if Bank B payed Bank A
- Bank A gets both the original loss back from Bank B but also the same again from Bank C.
- Bank C took out yet another CDS with Bank D to remove the risk of having to pay Bank A
- Bank D took out a CDS against Bank A's original financial instrument with Bank A.
- Bank A then used the payment from Bank C to pay Bank D.
- Ad infinitum
So which Bank loses money? Nobody knows, not even them - but somebody eats the loss. Seems the citizens of any country with a Bank eat it.
The problem we have here is that the same folk that created the problem are trying to solve it. No fresh thinking, no real change in policies - accompanied by the dictum not to let a good crisis go to waste. Using this, or any, crisis to inject more of the same that caused it doesn't, unsurprisingly, appear to work. Never mind, we'll keep going until the life is choked out of it.
Not unexpectedly Obama and Cameron have popped-up demanding a quick fix. Primarily because when, not if, it all goes to rat-shit their banks will topple along with the rest. London and New York are the places that most carcinogenic financial instruments call home.
Let's not forget that, back when all this started in 2007, the estimated value of financial instruments lurking about the world was somewhere between 100 and 300 trillion dollars. Even if only 10% of them go bad - a joke - more like 40% on present estimates - then somebody has to print between 10 and 120 trillion dollars worth of money and give it to the banks. And these estimates are on the conservative side. As all these instruments are in US dollars that would be bad, bad, bad for them - hence Obama's deep interest in having Europe not fuck the US economy.
Inflation won't solve it. Given the present state of the world's economy the result of a sufficient increase in money supply will be Stagflation - which we are already seeing signs of. Eviscerating trust in money and the printing of 100,000 Dollar, Pound, Euro notes to buy a cup of coffee doesn't sound like one of the better solutions.
So a very, very big turd is about to drop into the fan. This has been constipating since International Accounting Standards, introduced in 2005, prevented companies from provisioning against potential losses before they actually incurred them. Which is, of course, why banks are only now announcing hundreds of billions of losses and looking for some more free cash. Those now looking for the money are the same folk that lobbied for the change to accounting standards in the first place - so they could artificially keep their profits up - even if they knew that a debt was going bad. Better for the share price and the bonuses.
Anyway, I get back to my contention that Globalisation contains the seeds of it's own demise. When there is too little or no domestic industry, manufacturing or production and the banks are making unprecedented piles of money that money has to go somewhere and it, by default, goes into real property as that is the only place left for it to go
Around the turn of the millenium the same lack of alternatives created the "Tech" bubble.
To absorb the fists-full of money spewing out of the banks house prices exploded, builders went on the rampage. When regulations wouldn't permit this path they were changed or new markets created outside regulatory oversight. Not only did the finance industry believe they had found an infallible way to remove risk but they also didn't have to admit that they had lost the money until the instrument was undeniably dead and the loss was taken onto the books. So they had a few years to record record profits and bonuses before they became too big to fail.
The original bail-out money they were given was used to maintain this fiction - now that it has all been spent either they get another round of bail-out or they go down. Any money going to Spain to prop-up it's banks will be used to extend and pretend. When the next 100 billion of property market bad debt pops up, or RBS needs another 40 billion to survive, it'll be another matter entirely.
The problem we have here is that the same folk that created the problem are trying to solve it. No fresh thinking, no real change in policies - accompanied by the dictum not to let a good crisis go to waste. Using this, or any, crisis to inject more of the same that caused it doesn't, unsurprisingly, appear to work. Never mind, we'll keep going until the life is choked out of it.
Not unexpectedly Obama and Cameron have popped-up demanding a quick fix. Primarily because when, not if, it all goes to rat-shit their banks will topple along with the rest. London and New York are the places that most carcinogenic financial instruments call home.
Let's not forget that, back when all this started in 2007, the estimated value of financial instruments lurking about the world was somewhere between 100 and 300 trillion dollars. Even if only 10% of them go bad - a joke - more like 40% on present estimates - then somebody has to print between 10 and 120 trillion dollars worth of money and give it to the banks. And these estimates are on the conservative side. As all these instruments are in US dollars that would be bad, bad, bad for them - hence Obama's deep interest in having Europe not fuck the US economy.
Inflation won't solve it. Given the present state of the world's economy the result of a sufficient increase in money supply will be Stagflation - which we are already seeing signs of. Eviscerating trust in money and the printing of 100,000 Dollar, Pound, Euro notes to buy a cup of coffee doesn't sound like one of the better solutions.
So a very, very big turd is about to drop into the fan. This has been constipating since International Accounting Standards, introduced in 2005, prevented companies from provisioning against potential losses before they actually incurred them. Which is, of course, why banks are only now announcing hundreds of billions of losses and looking for some more free cash. Those now looking for the money are the same folk that lobbied for the change to accounting standards in the first place - so they could artificially keep their profits up - even if they knew that a debt was going bad. Better for the share price and the bonuses.
Anyway, I get back to my contention that Globalisation contains the seeds of it's own demise. When there is too little or no domestic industry, manufacturing or production and the banks are making unprecedented piles of money that money has to go somewhere and it, by default, goes into real property as that is the only place left for it to go
Around the turn of the millenium the same lack of alternatives created the "Tech" bubble.
To absorb the fists-full of money spewing out of the banks house prices exploded, builders went on the rampage. When regulations wouldn't permit this path they were changed or new markets created outside regulatory oversight. Not only did the finance industry believe they had found an infallible way to remove risk but they also didn't have to admit that they had lost the money until the instrument was undeniably dead and the loss was taken onto the books. So they had a few years to record record profits and bonuses before they became too big to fail.
The original bail-out money they were given was used to maintain this fiction - now that it has all been spent either they get another round of bail-out or they go down. Any money going to Spain to prop-up it's banks will be used to extend and pretend. When the next 100 billion of property market bad debt pops up, or RBS needs another 40 billion to survive, it'll be another matter entirely.
No comments:
Post a Comment